The Sophomore English class I teach has a short story unit. It's at the beginning of the year in an attempt to incorporate literary elements early on, as well as to ease kids in to literary analysis. The stories we read are:
The Lottery by Shirley Jackson
Lamb to the Slaughter by Roald Dahl
A Sound of Thunder by Ray Bradbury
Masque of the Red Death by Edgar Allan Poe
A & P by John Updike
I'm super passionate about all five, and students tend to like at least a few (the Dahl and Bradbury most).
However, of the five, the most recent was written in 1961 (Updike), and none have any racial or sexual diversity. Table 9.1 of chapter 9 has three columns: a literary element, the classical short story taught with it, and a young adult short story that also exhibits that element well. I think this is an awesome way to give students some choice while still teaching the literary elements.
If I were to teach this unit again, I would probably give the young adult options next to the classic options and allow a choice. Perhaps for each literary element, students could choose which text they wanted, so long as they chose at least two from the "classics" column.
Chapter 10 is over non-fiction, which is a personal favorite of mine. I love learning new things through books, and I'm always pleasantly surprised by the amount of students who ask for non-fiction recommendations. Cole gives some good questions for evaluating and selecting non-fiction, such as "is the author and authority in his/her field?" and "is there a clear distinction between fact and opinion?"
I think these questions are important to teach students, especially in an age where any nonsense can be written on the internet and shared as fact.
Sports non-fiction is another genre that is engaging to students, especially those who often say they don't enjoy reading. When I ask a student what they are interested in and they respond "sports," I am thrilled to offer them a plethora of reading options.
Cole ends the chapter with suggestions for teaching text structure and summarizing with non-fiction. She includes charts and graphic organizers that could easily be replicated. She states, "As English language arts teachers, we should include a fair amount of nonfiction in our curriculum, providing models for the kinds of writing we ask them to do and models for other kinds of real-world reading and writing" (509).
Thursday, April 30, 2015
Sunday, April 26, 2015
Chapters 7 & 8 of YAL in the 21st Century
*The end is near! I graduate May 15! I have so much work to do before then!*
I love the tables of book suggestions in this text. I always flip forward and read those first before I read the rest of the chapter, just to see how many of the suggestions I've read and to get a general feel of what I should expect from the chapter.
Chapter 7 is titled "Mysteries, Thriller, and Horror," and this is a chapter I needed to read. I have lots of kids ask for scary suggestions, and I usually have to defer them to the librarian. I am someone who HATES being scared, so I stay away from scary books. (I try to stay away from scary movies, but my husband is a horror addict, so sometimes I get roped into watching them.)
This chapter talked a little about why people like to be scared, but I still think those people are nuts. Being scared is a terrible feeling. I don't like feeling terrible.
Anyway. For those who do enjoy feeling terrible, I now have a list of options. One thing I really enjoy about this text is that all the books they recommend have literary merit. I'm familiar with most of the authors, even if I haven't read the texts. Furthermore, the tables are broken into sections for younger, older, and mature teens.
Near the end of the chapter, Cole writes a section on inferential thinking and metacognition that has some helpful suggestions for getting students to make inferences. I plan to try her think aloud strategies such as read, infer, share and also Kelly Gallagher's strategy of word scramble.
Chapter 8 is over science fiction and fantasy, another weak spot for me. Cole breaks down many sub-genres such as "space operas, cyberpunk, and other science fiction adventures" and "genetics, DNA, and cloning." I love the idea of finding a topic students are interested in and being able to recommend several books they might enjoy.
She again gives reading strategies, this time visualizing strategies. I appreciate the section on visualizing nonfiction since the Common Core is so heavy on NF. Furthermore, she suggests vocabulary strategies since many science fiction books tend to be heavy on new words.
Next up: short stories and non fiction. I'm excited to get suggestions here, as the last book I need to read for this class is one from that genre.
I love the tables of book suggestions in this text. I always flip forward and read those first before I read the rest of the chapter, just to see how many of the suggestions I've read and to get a general feel of what I should expect from the chapter.
Chapter 7 is titled "Mysteries, Thriller, and Horror," and this is a chapter I needed to read. I have lots of kids ask for scary suggestions, and I usually have to defer them to the librarian. I am someone who HATES being scared, so I stay away from scary books. (I try to stay away from scary movies, but my husband is a horror addict, so sometimes I get roped into watching them.)
This chapter talked a little about why people like to be scared, but I still think those people are nuts. Being scared is a terrible feeling. I don't like feeling terrible.
![]() |
| the exception to this is The Shining because it is a work of genius. |
Anyway. For those who do enjoy feeling terrible, I now have a list of options. One thing I really enjoy about this text is that all the books they recommend have literary merit. I'm familiar with most of the authors, even if I haven't read the texts. Furthermore, the tables are broken into sections for younger, older, and mature teens.
Near the end of the chapter, Cole writes a section on inferential thinking and metacognition that has some helpful suggestions for getting students to make inferences. I plan to try her think aloud strategies such as read, infer, share and also Kelly Gallagher's strategy of word scramble.
Chapter 8 is over science fiction and fantasy, another weak spot for me. Cole breaks down many sub-genres such as "space operas, cyberpunk, and other science fiction adventures" and "genetics, DNA, and cloning." I love the idea of finding a topic students are interested in and being able to recommend several books they might enjoy.
She again gives reading strategies, this time visualizing strategies. I appreciate the section on visualizing nonfiction since the Common Core is so heavy on NF. Furthermore, she suggests vocabulary strategies since many science fiction books tend to be heavy on new words.
Next up: short stories and non fiction. I'm excited to get suggestions here, as the last book I need to read for this class is one from that genre.
Sunday, April 12, 2015
Book Review: Out of the Easy
This book is the easiest sell to kids ever.
"Hey guys! So this book has New Orleans, prostitution, the mob, and a cute relationship!"
![]() |
| This was my kids after the book talk |
The basic plot is that we have Josie, a teenager who lives in the French Quarter in the 1950s. Josie loves books and wants to go to college after high school, but there's a big problem.
Her mother is a prostitute.
Not only that, but Josie's part time job is cleaning the brothel every morning. (My kids had hilarious reactions upon hearing this, and yeah. Ew.)
Basically, her mom is one big old mess, constantly in trouble/mixed up with the wrong people, and makes it very difficult for Josie to gain her education. There's your ubiquitous love triangle as well, but it has an interesting twist. And motorcyclist Jesse, one point of the triangle, is totally delicious.
(I'm not sure what it says about me that I am a 26 year old woman who still falls for teenage dreamboats in YAL...I swear I'm not a creep in real life...)
I really enjoyed the relationships in this book and how they are realistically complicated. For example, the madam of the brothel is far more of a mother to Josie than her biological mother. I just love shades of grey in novels. (Ironically, Ruta Sepetys also wrote Between Shades of Grey.)
The kids who've read this so far have flown through it and told me they enjoyed it. And I think it's the first historical fiction-esque book I've book talked, so yay for diversity. It wasn't a perfect book, but at the same time I can't think of any complaints.
4.5 out of 5 badass madams
![]() |
| Not saying Scarlett O'Hara was a madam, but I'm also not-not saying that. This is just how I imagine the character Willie looking. |
Tuesday, April 7, 2015
Book Review: Shiver
I've started doing a series of videos on Instagram called 15 Second Book Reviews. They are silly and usually occur after a few beers, and a couple weeks ago I made one for Shiver by Maggie Stiefvater. I will expand on it in this review, but the basic arguments I make are that Shiver is basically just Twilight but with werewolves...although wait, Twilight already has werewolves...so it's like if Bella and Edward were werewolves.
Unfortunately, the main characters are about as boring and one dimintional as B+E. I chose this book as brain candy but continually had to force myself to pick it up. It was just dull.
The basic overview is as follows. Grace is in love with the wolf outside her house. She only sees him in the winter. One time the wolves bit her. She loves her wolf anyway. He has yellow eyes. One day she found a naked, bloody boy outside her door. He had the same yellow eyes. Can you tell where this is going. Are you bored of my writing yet.
It's just so unfortunately formulaic; I'm bored even remembering it. There is one amusing part where three teenagers steal a vile of meningitis and infect their friends with it...too bad I only laughed because it was so stupid. There are just so many more engaging fantasy or paranormal reads out there; don't bother with this one.
One out of five Bella Swans.
Unfortunately, the main characters are about as boring and one dimintional as B+E. I chose this book as brain candy but continually had to force myself to pick it up. It was just dull.
The basic overview is as follows. Grace is in love with the wolf outside her house. She only sees him in the winter. One time the wolves bit her. She loves her wolf anyway. He has yellow eyes. One day she found a naked, bloody boy outside her door. He had the same yellow eyes. Can you tell where this is going. Are you bored of my writing yet.
It's just so unfortunately formulaic; I'm bored even remembering it. There is one amusing part where three teenagers steal a vile of meningitis and infect their friends with it...too bad I only laughed because it was so stupid. There are just so many more engaging fantasy or paranormal reads out there; don't bother with this one.
One out of five Bella Swans.
Wednesday, March 18, 2015
In Defense of Escapism
It happened just last week: I went down to the high school library and checked out a copy of Shiver by Maggie Stiefvater.
"Are you kidding?" the librarian asked, "You have so much reading to do!" (She knows the amount I read for grad school well, considering I complain about it to her 24/7.)
"I know, I know. I just need something to read to get my mind off all this reading."
It sounds ridiculous, but reading is my main form of escape from the trials of daily life, even when those trials are...reading.
In Young Adult Literature in the 21st Century, Cole presents a brilliant defense of many types of "lighter" or "low-brow" reading, including that of the romance novel.
"If we exam[ine] literary female images in history, we can deepen our understanding of this longing and female attraction to contemporary romances, stories in which female sexuality isn't oppressed and demoralized and in which characters fall head over heals [sic] in love. Consider the historical silencing of women's voices in literature and images of women in masculocentric literary works traditionally dominating English language arts classrooms...No wonder girls long for literature portraying women in happier circumstances and ending on a happy, yet predictable note..." (168-169).
***Feminist disclaimer here: obviously not all girls long for literature that is happy and predictable. Some prefer hard-hitting, serious literature. Some prefer both. Some prefer neither.***
But it's true that many of my students who are young women gravitate toward romance or chick lit. And it's also true that they often get teased for reading such, as the stereotype is that such books are poorly written, predictable, trashy, fluff, etc. Some of them probably are. But does it matter?
Many moons ago, on our classroom blog during my last year of undergrad, I wrote a post defending Twilight. My argument was that, even though I personally thought Twilight was drivel, at least students were reading. And, I proposed, mightn't students then move on to "deeper" literature?
Since then, I've read a study that suggests that low-brow literature actually isn't a gateway to more academic literature, but I can't for the life of me remember where I found it. Anyone know what I'm talking about?
Regardless, I've changed my thinking a bit since writing my original Twilight post. I think that, even if romance books aren't a gateway to other literature, it doesn't really matter. I personally want to read a variety of books from many genres, but who am I to say that others shouldn't stick with what they enjoy? A woman I babysit for has shelves upon shelves of Harlequins and similar. In all her bookshelves, I've never seen a book that's not a romance. But this woman is a reader; no one could deny that. She still experiences different perspectives, expands her vocabulary, gains empathy...all that I value in reading.
I love Cole's closing statement on romances:
"Whether we value romance or not, if we don't respect teens' [or adults'!] interest, we can't expect them to respect ours. The romance genre, more than any other, gives women a voice and provides a statement about the historical subjugation and objectification of women" (182).
Certainly, I can value a person's reading interests even if they are different than mine! Cole continues her chapter and the next by defending humor, sports books, and historical fiction. She just keeps hitting it out of the park in this textbook. Now, if you need me, I'll be curled up on my couch escaping from my homework through teenage werewolves in love.
"Are you kidding?" the librarian asked, "You have so much reading to do!" (She knows the amount I read for grad school well, considering I complain about it to her 24/7.)
"I know, I know. I just need something to read to get my mind off all this reading."
It sounds ridiculous, but reading is my main form of escape from the trials of daily life, even when those trials are...reading.
In Young Adult Literature in the 21st Century, Cole presents a brilliant defense of many types of "lighter" or "low-brow" reading, including that of the romance novel.
"If we exam[ine] literary female images in history, we can deepen our understanding of this longing and female attraction to contemporary romances, stories in which female sexuality isn't oppressed and demoralized and in which characters fall head over heals [sic] in love. Consider the historical silencing of women's voices in literature and images of women in masculocentric literary works traditionally dominating English language arts classrooms...No wonder girls long for literature portraying women in happier circumstances and ending on a happy, yet predictable note..." (168-169).
***Feminist disclaimer here: obviously not all girls long for literature that is happy and predictable. Some prefer hard-hitting, serious literature. Some prefer both. Some prefer neither.***
But it's true that many of my students who are young women gravitate toward romance or chick lit. And it's also true that they often get teased for reading such, as the stereotype is that such books are poorly written, predictable, trashy, fluff, etc. Some of them probably are. But does it matter?
Many moons ago, on our classroom blog during my last year of undergrad, I wrote a post defending Twilight. My argument was that, even though I personally thought Twilight was drivel, at least students were reading. And, I proposed, mightn't students then move on to "deeper" literature?
Since then, I've read a study that suggests that low-brow literature actually isn't a gateway to more academic literature, but I can't for the life of me remember where I found it. Anyone know what I'm talking about?
Regardless, I've changed my thinking a bit since writing my original Twilight post. I think that, even if romance books aren't a gateway to other literature, it doesn't really matter. I personally want to read a variety of books from many genres, but who am I to say that others shouldn't stick with what they enjoy? A woman I babysit for has shelves upon shelves of Harlequins and similar. In all her bookshelves, I've never seen a book that's not a romance. But this woman is a reader; no one could deny that. She still experiences different perspectives, expands her vocabulary, gains empathy...all that I value in reading.
![]() |
| In high school, this was the one we passed around |
I love Cole's closing statement on romances:
"Whether we value romance or not, if we don't respect teens' [or adults'!] interest, we can't expect them to respect ours. The romance genre, more than any other, gives women a voice and provides a statement about the historical subjugation and objectification of women" (182).
Certainly, I can value a person's reading interests even if they are different than mine! Cole continues her chapter and the next by defending humor, sports books, and historical fiction. She just keeps hitting it out of the park in this textbook. Now, if you need me, I'll be curled up on my couch escaping from my homework through teenage werewolves in love.
Wednesday, March 4, 2015
Teaching Notes for Blue Lipstick
The following are some ideas for teaching Blue Lipstick: Concrete Poems by John Grandits.
Author Information
Grandits, John. Blue
Lipstick: Concrete Poems. New
York: Clarion Books, 2007.
Author Information
·
Book
and magazine designer who lives in New Jersey
·
This
is his second book of concrete poetry; his first, Technically, it’s Not My Fault, was an ALA Notable Book
·
Identifies
as a concrete poet and children’s author
Summary of Plot and Characters
Grandits’s first book, Technically, it’s Not My Fault, follows
a boy named Robert as he shares his life and complaints about his sister,
Jessie. Blue Lipstick is his Jessie’s side of the story. Jessie expresses her high school life through
concrete poetry (words that make pictures and patterns). She plays volleyball and cello and
occasionally fights with her parents and younger brother…not to mention her English
teacher. As she writes her poems, she
begins tearing down walls she’s put up, or at least letting more people over to
the other side, “I mean, a girl’s got to have some standards.” She learns
that even the popular, pretty cheerleaders like Andrea are regular people—most of
them, anyway. And even though blue
lipstick isn’t her color, she’s going to wear it regardless.
Historical Placement/Relevance
Blue
Lipstick encapsulates the experience of adolescents in the early 21st
century. Their joys, heartaches, and
school & family dramas all make an appearance in this short but poignant
book of poetry. Students would enjoy
this text because it obviously relevant to their lives now—something they often search for in their readings. This would fit in perfectly with a poetry
unit and appeal to those students who are artistic. In our school, the art department does
blackout poetry, so I could see them collaborating with the English department
to do concrete poetry as well. Or, since
these poems could also be created using technology and different types of
software, the computer programming classes could get involved. The options for cross-curricular instruction
with this book go beyond the norm of English/History or English/Science.
Annotated Bibliography
“A Brief
Guide to Concrete Poetry.” Poets.org. 2004.
This website gives a brief
explanation of concrete poetry and puts it in a historical context as
well. I would use this in my
introduction to the concept.
Furthermore, this site cites e.e. cummings and Dylan Thomas as two of
the first poets to use concrete poetry, and these are two poets we already
study.
“Five Reasons Why
We Need Poetry in Schools.” Edutopia. 8
April 2013. http://www.edutopia.org/blog/five-reasons-poetry-needed-schools-elena-aguilar
Sure, this is a blog post, but it’s
one by a leadership coach who makes a great claim for why we should teach
poetry in schools. Since buy-in is so
important for students, and they often ask “why are we doing this?!” sharing
these reasons could be helpful. I
especially like number 3: “Poetry opens venues for speaking and listening, much
neglected domains of a robust English Language Arts curriculum. Think spoken
word and poetry slams… Shared in this way, poetry brings audience, authentic
audience, which motivates reluctant writers (or most writers, for that matter)”
and number 4: “Poetry has space for English Language Learners. Because poems
defy rules, poetry can be made accessible for ELLs -- poems can be easily
scaffolded and students can find ways of expressing their voices while being
limited in their vocabulary. Furthermore, poetry is universal…”
Furnham,
Adrian. “Writing as Therapy.” Psychology Today.
29 August 2013.
Dr. Furnham explains the value of
psychotherapy, or “the talking cure” and how this translates into processing
through “the writing cure.” He
specifically notes poetry, writing that “Poets have encapsulated great pain and
pleasure as well as awe and awefulness [sic] in sparse beautifully crafted
words.” He explains the psychology behind it, noting that “Writing is also
often redemptive. And it helps because nearly always it involves some
commitment to change.” I would have students read this to help them understand
the psychology behind therapeutic writing and also to include some non-fiction
into this unit.
“Visual
Poetry App for iPhone & iPad.” Image Chef.
2015.
Since
our school has iPads, this app would be the perfect way to integrate technology
into our poems. Students could choose
between drawing out their concrete poems by hand or using this app to do it
digitally. This may be one way to
include the computer programming classes.
Other Topics I Plan to Explore Further:
·
Writing
as therapy
·
Best
young adult poetry books
·
Making
concrete poems digitally
·
Sites
that show examples of concrete poems—many links are broken on the main sites
for this
Sunday, March 1, 2015
Review of Kelly Gallagher's Write Like This
*This review was written for another class (and is technically still a rough draft), but I've found his book so helpful that I want to share it in every medium possible!*
By
now, most English teachers are familiar with Kelly Gallagher. His books Readicide
and Deeper Reading are well respected
in the profession. His newest work, Write Like This, is sure to be no
exception. Teachers should come into
this book prepared for a plethora of authentic writing prompts, samples, and
ideas. Indeed, Gallagher’s philosophy on
writing can be summed up in that one word:
authentic. He stresses the
importance of teaching the types of writing which students will use throughout
their adult lives. Gallagher addresses
each of these types of writing, using Common Core State Standards as a guide,
with aplomb.
Chapter
one begins with a probing question: “Do your students write well enough to
become police officers?” Gallagher
explains that candidates for the California Highway Patrol must take an exam
that specifically focuses on writing and is composed of questions quite similar
to the ACT’s reading and writing portions.
Real-world applications are key for Gallagher, who argues on page 15, “My
sense is that the writing requirements of most schools actually serve to limit
our developing writers. If we want young
artists to develop their skills, we must move them beyond the narrowly
prescribed school writing discourses found in most school districts and stretch
them into areas that can be readily applied in the real world.” He categorizes these real-world writing
purposes into six categories: express
and reflect, inform and explain, evaluate and judge, inquire and explore,
analyze and interpret, and take a stand/propose a solution.
An
incredibly valuable tool Gallagher uses to argue the importance of these six
writing purposes is a newspaper. He
argues that one can find any of these types of writing in a newspaper and gives
examples of such. He then breaks down
his chapters into each type of writing.
For each writing purpose, he gives the reader many writing prompts that
address both standards and these real-world writing types. In addition to the prompts, he gives examples
of his writing as well as student writing.
He includes tables with such student examples, although it’s obvious
that these examples are the crème de la crème.
My one criticism of this and other teaching handbooks are that the
examples tend to be much more sophisticated than the average high school
student. Rose’s Lives on the Boundary tends toward this as well. It would be refreshing to see some examples
that aren’t quite so advanced.
Since
reading this book over the summer, I have used it innumerable times throughout
the school year. The most consistent way
has been through my classroom blogs.
Last year I began blogging as a way to practice low-stakes writing
combined with technology. The posts
simply took the place of paper writing assignments, however. This year, I took Gallagher’s prompts and
compiled them into a page on our classroom blogs. I made a list of four to five prompts under
each writing purpose, and I then assigned students two of each writing purpose. Now, each time they do a blog post, my
students choose whichever prompt interests them most. This keeps them practicing authentic
writing.
Teachers
who don’t blog with their students can still benefit greatly from Write Like This. The dozens of prompts are adaptable and could
be used for many types of low-stakes writing and even for formative
assessments. Just as Lucille Schultz
found that students do better when they are given developmentally appropriate
writing assignments, Gallagher has supplied prompts that adolescents will find
interesting and engaging.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)







